1 min read

March's Retail Hive round tables

March's Retail Hive round tables

We were back at The Retail Hive Tech Leaders event this March, hosting round table discussions on derisking major IT change and ensuring fast, successful transitions.

Held under Chatham House rules, the conversations were candid, sometimes uncomfortable, and long overdue. 

We structured discussions around four areas:

  • Why programmes slip and how to avoid it upfront
  • Full ecosystem testing
  • Whether failures come from people or systems
  • What volumes you should actually be stress testing to.

For the full details, view the digest. Here's a summary what the group surfaced: 

 

Slippage starts earlier than you think 

When we asked leaders to identify the first warning sign from their last programme that slipped, nobody pointed to a technical failure. Issues linked back to strategy, scope assumptions, governance gaps, and pressure to start before a programme was truly ready.  

 

"Tested" means different things to different people 

Integrations, third-party dependencies, data flows, and legacy systems are frequently assumed to work rather than verified, and those are exactly the parts that break first in production.  

E2E test confidence needs clear ownership, and value stream mapping of the testing process was viewed as a practical, underused tool for understanding where the critical scenarios actually sit. 

 

The real culprit is rarely the technology 

The most consistent theme of the day: when programmes fail, it's almost never because the systems weren't good enough. Skills gaps surface too late. Incentive structures such as bonuses and exec pressure push teams faster than the risk profile allows.  

The round table participants all agreed for a need to involve all relevant teams in UAT, test your rollback plan (not just document it), and put culture and stakeholder engagement on the agenda at every stage. 

 

Stress testing is about learning, not just confirming  

Most organisations test against last year's peak. Fewer account for the compounding effects of promotions, bad data, or partial outages.  

In many cases, nobody has clear ownership of signing off that performance risk is 'acceptable'  which means nobody is truly owning that call. 

One phrase that stuck with us: change should be exhilarating. Getting the basics right and keeping sight of why you're doing the programme in the first place are what make that possible. 

We're grateful to everyone who took part and shared so openly. Download the full digest below. 

About The Retail Hive

The Retail Hive brings senior retailers together to soundboard, benchmark, and collaborate as a collective. It provides safe, co-owned environments for retailers and partners to build meaningful relationships and promote best practice. 

 

Related posts

Ten things that stuck: Retail Technology Show 2026

Ten things that stuck: Retail Technology Show 2026

Key insights from the Retail Technology Show 2026, focusing on AI governance, transformation, and the complexities of retail tech implementation.

Read More
What retail tech leaders are talking about: Retail Jam 2026

What retail tech leaders are talking about: Retail Jam 2026

Explore the critical conversations from Retail Jam 2026 on AI, trust, and quality in retail technology. Learn how businesses are navigating new...

Read More
Insights from October's Retail Hive Tech Leaders

Insights from October's Retail Hive Tech Leaders

Our digest of the October 2025 Retail Hive Tech Leaders event at the IOD in London.

Read More
Reflecting on RTS 2025

Reflecting on RTS 2025

Spike's reflections on the 2025 Retail Technology Show at Excel London, 2nd to 3rd April 2025.

Read More
The challenges for retail

The challenges for retail

As experienced retail testing experts, Spike95 observe the challenges for retail and here are some of our latest thoughts on the subject.

Read More